- Matt Mills McKnight
- To love or to hate: Sandpoint’s new public art is gaining attention, good and bad.
You can’t please everybody. It’s a lesson Sandpoint, Idaho, city officials are learning as they take criticism over a recently dedicated public art installation in the city’s downtown.
“It could have been cooler,” says Sarah Best, a 24-year-old barista who works at the nearby Starbucks. “It looks a little tacky with all the road signs.”
“The money could have gone toward Kinderhaven or Angels Over Sandpoint,” she says, referring to a pair of local social-service nonprofits.
The piece riling this Northern Idaho community isn’t some Buddhist elephant god or a feces-covered Madonna but, instead, a collection of fish crafted from recycled road signs. The fish form a rainbow of blues, oranges, yellows and whites that flop their way across the arch. Some read “ski area,” “anti-icing” and “airport” — a reminder of their former lives as instructional signage.
Known as “Sand Creek Arch,” the piece was created by Sandpoint artist Nelson Boren. It now stands on First Avenue near the Panida Theater. The piece was financed by a $37,000 grant from the Idaho Transportation Department, according to city project coordinator Stephen Drinkard. The idea of the arch is to frame Sand Creek, which lies a short distance away.
But some Sandpoint residents see it as an eyesore. Online comments in response to a Bonner County Daily Bee story also criticized the piece.
“I hope future works of art are easier on the eyes,” wrote one commenter. “With the arch, I notice a bunch of pieces of signs first, then realize the signs are cut into fish shapes. Sorry artist, but I would have preferred if the signs were all turned around so the fish would be silver and noticeable before realizing it was a bunch of recycled road signs.... but that is just my opinion.”
The controversial arch also comes as Sandpoint seeks to add more public art to its already well-known cache of resident artists and galleries. The city last week accepted proposals for a series of public installations to be installed nearby, on Second Avenue. Those pieces will be financed by $18,000 from the local urban renewal agency and could be installed as early as winter, according to Drinkard.
There is also a plan to install a smaller arch and more boardwalk space down by Sand Creek, not far from Boren’s arch, according to Drinkard.
Drinkard, who speaks enthusiastically of plans to ratchet up Sandpoint’s reputation as an artists’ haven, says complaints about the public art piece are overblown.
“This is sort of a tempest in a teapot,” he says. “Some people said ‘I think there’s too many colors’ or ‘They should shimmer more.’”
“I had a City Council person the other day [who] said the Nelson Boren piece is polarizing,” Drinkard says. “Polarizing would be if we had a statue of a naked man with his genitalia exposed. The majority of people would be aghast, some would think it’s really funny.”
Boren, the artist, did not return an email last week seeking comment. Carol Deaner, chairwoman of the Sandpoint Arts Commission, said Boren is living in China through next spring.
But Deaner says that the point of public art is to provoke discussion.
“I’d like to see some people looking at them, talking about them, discussing them,” she says.
Deaner adds that she has heard comments similar to the one written on the Daily Bee’s website.
“They thought it was too busy, they thought it was the wrong location,” she says. “People either thought it was wonderful or they didn’t like it.”
Several Sandpoint residents and visitors told The Inlander that they like Boren’s creation.
“I love public art; it spruces everything up,” says Trevor Lazenby, a Canadian who vacations every year for a week in the Sandpoint area.
“I’d rather look at this than the alternative,” the 40-year-old says as he sits on a bench next to the arch.
Art, in fact, has helped draw the Lazenby family to Sandpoint. Before he and his wife had kids, they “used to visit just about every gallery along [First Avenue].”
Resident Pat Packowski likes the art because its helps cement her city’s reputation.
“I like it, because I think of Sandpoint as an artsy town and I really think they’re trying to develop it,” Packowski, 65, says.
The city’s long-range artistic plans are even more ambitious. Drinkard says he hopes “to incorporate public art into any construction thing we do, or any opportunity we have.”
“The more pieces we have like the arch or other things we’re working on here,” he says, “it will help make a reason for people to come downtown.”
Boren’s arch may eventually just become another piece of the varied downtown landscape in Sandpoint: something noticed but not remarked on, discussed or unpacked.
“The first time I saw it, I thought it looked really ugly,” says Alan Barber, 65, as he walks his dog near downtown. “But, it’s grown on me.”